Read More.

Call for Paper - December – 2024 Edition   

(SJIF Impact Factor: 5.966) (IJIFACTOR 3.8, RANKING: A+) (PIF: 3.460)

IJATCA solicits original research papers for the December – 2024 Edition.
Last date of manuscript submission is December 30, 2024.

                                                   

A GENTLE INTRODUCTION OF SERVICE-ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE IN DEVELOPMENT OF LEADING TECHNOLOGIES


Volume: 8 Issue: 2
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Robin Khurana, Sanjay Madaan



Abstract

Service-Oriented Architecture is a technique which can be employed to unite various services over the operating systems, platforms and networks. Several organizations fail to completely use SOA and the reason behind this is underdeveloped adoption process. The author has conducted an exploratory study to explore the recent concerns and numerous practices related with SOA adoption along with assessing various maturity levels used, role of information technology in SOA adoption. The required information is gathered by conducting a literature survey that explored the previously done work on SOA adoption by surfing through the net, reading journals and papers. The paper focuses on various significant issues related with adoption of SOA in organizations.

References

  1. Shaheen, M., Anees, T., Hussain, N., & Obaid, I. (2019). A research on SOA in the IT industry of Pakistan. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1482, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323933.3324080

  2. Abdellatif, M., Hecht, G., Mili, H., Elboussaidi, G., Moha, N., Shatnawi, A., … Guéhéneuc, Y.-G. (2018). State of the Practice in Service Identification for SOA Migration in Industry. In Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 11236, pp. 634–650). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03596-9_46

  3. Alsaryrah, O., Mashal, I., & Chung, T.-Y. (2018). Energy-aware services composition for Internet of Things. In 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) (Vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 604–608). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT.2018.8355213

  4. Hayet, T., & Knani, J. (2019). SOAP-Based Web Service for Localization of Multi-robot System in Cloud. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 857, pp. 398– 410). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01177-2_29

  5. Rodríguez, G., Díaz-Pace, J. A., & Soria, Á. (2018). A case-based reasoning approach to reuse quality-driven designs in service-oriented architectures. Information Systems, 77, 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2018.06.003

  6. Hirschheim, R., Welke, R., & Schwarz, A. (2010). Service-oriented architecture: myths, realities, and a maturity model. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(1), 37–48.

  7. Puttonen, J., Lobov, A., Soto, M. A. C., & Lastra, J. L. M. (2019). Cloud computing as a facilitator for web service composition in factory automation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(2), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1277-z

  8. Gupta, P., Mokal, T. P., Shah, D. D., & Satyanarayana, K. V. V. (2018). Event-Driven SOABased IoT Architecture. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 247–258). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5520-1_24

  9. Emadi, S., & Hanza, R. H. (2013). Critical Factors in the Effective of Service-Oriented Architecture. Advances in Computer Science: An International Journal, 2(3), 26–30.

  10. Marks, E. A. E., & Bell, M. (2008). Service Oriented Architecture (SOA): a planning and implementation guide for business and technology. John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons.

  11. Koumaditis, Konstantinos, Themistocleous, M., Mantzana, V., & Souliotis, K. (2012). A Proposition of Critical Success Factors Influencing SOA Implementation in Healthcare. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).

  12. Yoon, T., & Carter, P. E. (2007). Investigating the antecedents and benefits of SOA implementation: A multi-case study approach. AMCIS Proceedings, Paper 195

  13. Tang, L.-L., Chan, Y., & Shen, S.-L. (2019). Investigating radio-frequency identification usage behaviours and organisational performance according to factors of user perception. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 25(3/4), 199.

  14. A. Grigoriu, SOA, BPM, EA, and Service Oriented Enterprise Architecture BPTrends, www. bptrends.com, 2007

  15. S. Jayashetty, P. Kumar, Adopting Service Oriented Architecture increases the flexibility of your enterprise, 2006.

  16. E. Newcomer, G. Lomow, Understanding SOA with Web Services (Independent Technology Guides). Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004.

  17. T. Erl, Service-Oriented Architecture Concept, Technology and Design (Pearson Inc., Upper Saddle River, 2005)

  18. Tsai et al. (2006). “Perspectives on Service-Oriented Computing and Service-Oriented System Engineering”, Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE\"06), pp. 505-512.

  19. Bano, M. and N. Ikram. (2011), “KM-SORE: knowledge management for service oriented requirements engineering”, 6th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances ICSEA, pp. 129-136.

  20. C. Lawrence, Adapting legacy systems for SOA, Online, June, 2007

  21. OASIS, Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0, OASIS Standard, 2006

  22. J. Bih, Service oriented architecture (SOA) a new paradigm to implement dynamic e-business solutions. Ubiquity 2006, 4 (2006)

  23. S. Mulik, S. Ajgaonkar, K. Sharma, Where do you want to go in your SOA adoption journey? IT Prof. 10, 36–39 (2008)

  24. A. T. Manes, SOA is dead; long live services, Burton Group, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/126/1722/soa-is-dead-long-live-services. [Accessed: 18-Mar-2010]

  25. F. Kenney, Ahh Shucks, SOA Is A Failure, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://blogs.gartner.com/frank_kenney/2008/11/12/%0Aahh-shucks-soa-is-a-failure/. [Accessed: 14-Aug-2010]

  26. OASIS, Web services distributed management: management of web services (WSDM-MOWS) 1.0, OASIS-Standard, March, 2005

  27. M. Hiel, H. Weigand, W.-J. Van Den Heuvel, Enterprise Interoperability III (Springer, London,2008), pp. 197–208

  28. J.H. Lee, H.-J. Shim, K.K. Kim, Critical success factors in SOA implementation: an exploratory study. Inf. Syst. Manag. 27, 123–145 (2010)

  29. S. Tilley, J. Gerdes, T. Hamilton, S. Huang, H. Müller, D. Smith, K. Wong, On the business value and technical challenges of adopting web services. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. Res. Pract. 16, 31–50 (2004)

  30. M. Ren, K. K. Lyytinen, Building enterprise architecture agility and sustenance with SOA, Cais, 27 (4), 75–86 (2008)

  31. L. Cherbakov, M. Ibrahim, J. Ang, SOA Antipatterns: The obstacles to the adoption and successful realization of service-oriented architecture, 2006. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/ webservices/library/ws-antipatterns/. Accessed: 01-Feb-2010

  32. IBM Global services, Five best practices for deploying a successful service-oriented architecture(2008),http://viewer.media.bitpipe.com/1033409397_523/1212083066_235/wp_fivebest- practices-for-deploying-successful-soa.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2012

  33. K. Holley, J. Palistrant, S. Graham, Effective SOA governance IBM White Paper, IBM Corporation, March 2006.

  34. P. Kaur, S. Chatterjee, and D. Singh, “Neural network technique for diabetic retinopathydetection,” Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 440–445, 2019.

  35. Hooda, N., Bawa, S., & Rana, P. S. (2018). B2FSE framework for high dimensional imbalanced data: A case study for drug toxicity prediction. Neurocomputing, 276, 31-41.

  36. Hooda, N., Bawa, S., & Rana, P. S. (2018). Fraudulent firm classification: a case study of an external audit. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 48-64.

  37. Hooda, N., Bawa, S., & Rana, P. S. (2020). Optimizing Fraudulent Firm Prediction Using Ensemble Machine Learning: A Case Study of an External Audit. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 34(1), 20-30.

  38. Bhardwaj, R., & Hooda, N. (2019). Prediction of Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for breast cancer using ensemble machine learning. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 16, 100219.

  39. Gupta, R., Rao, U.P.: Achieving location privacy through CAST in location based services. Journal of Communication Network 19(3), 227–238 (2017)

  40. Gupta, R., Rao, U.P.: VIC-PRO: Vicinity protection by concealing location coordinates using geometrical transformations in location based services. Wireless Personal Communication 107(2), 1041–1059 (2019)

  41. Gupta, R., Rao, U.P.: A hybrid location privacy solution for mobile lbs. Mobile Information System, 2017 (2017)

  42. Gupta, R., Rao, U.P.: An exploration to location based service and its privacy preserving techniques: A survey. Wireless Personal Communication 96(2), 1973–2007 (2017)

  43. Gupta, R. and Rao, U.P.: Preserving location privacy using three layer RDV masking in geocoded published discrete point data. World Wide Web, 23(1), pp.175-206 (2020)

  44. S. Singh, M. Singh, C. Prakash, M. K. Gupta, M. Mia, and R. Singh, “Optimization and reliabilityanalysis to improve surface quality and mechanical characteristics of heat-treated fusedfilament fabricated parts,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 102, no. 5–8, pp. 1521–1536,2019.

Keywords

Service-Oriented Architecture.




© 2023 International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Applications (FCA), All right reserved.
Vision & Mission | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions